Homepage Program Systems: Theory and Applications Русская версия
ISSN 2079-3316 Bilingual online scientific Online scientific journal of the Ailamazyan Program System Institute of the Ailamazyan PSI of PSI of Russian Academy of Science of RAS 12+ 
Volume 17 (2026) . Issue 3 (72) . Paper No. 3 (513)

Medical Informatics

Research Article

Approaches to Assessing the Accuracy of Measurements Performed by AI-Services in Radiology

Evgeniya Alexandrovna Krylova1Correspondent author, Yuriy Alexandrovich Vasilev2, Vera Vladimirovna Soboleva3, Irina Andreevna Raznitsyna4, Tatiana Mikhailovna Bobrovskaya5, Kirill Mikhailovich Arzamasov6

1,4-6Scientific and Practical Clinical Center for Diagnostics and Telemedicine Technologies of the Moscow Department of Health, Moscow, Russia
3Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia
6MIREA - Russian Technological University, Moscow, Russia
1 Evgeniya Alexandrovna Krylova — Correspondent author KrylovaEA13@zdrav.mos.ru

Abstract. The importance of quantitative measurements in radiology is increasing, as is the number of artificial intelligence (AI) services being introduced into the field. However, assessment of their measurement accuracy remains insufficiently standardized and relies on statistical metrics that are not always applicable to domain-specific tasks. This study aimed to develop and conduct a preliminary evaluation of an automated method for assessing the quality of quantitative measurements performed by AI-services in radiology, using linear measurements of adrenal lesions on chest CT as an example.
The dataset comprised 90 chest CT examinations with annotations including a binary indicator of lesion presence and its measurement. The approach was evaluated using the outputs of two AI-services. Each measurement was scored according to its proximity to the reference standard (0, 0.5, or 1 point). The overall score was calculated as the mean score, with 0.81 adopted as the threshold for sufficient accuracy. Acceptable deviations were determined empirically: 2 (± 0.2) and 4 (± 0.4) mm defined the boundaries for correct and partially correct measurements, respectively.
The overall score was 0.914 (0.853–0.966) for AI-1 and 0.913 (0.857–0.968) for AI-2, while the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.94 and 0.93, Gwet’s AC2 was 0.97 and 0.96, respectively. No systematic bias was identified. The proposed approach enabled assessment of individual measurements as well as the overall performance quality of an AI-service and proved applicable for the task of measuring adrenal lesions on chest CT. (In Russian).

Keywords: Artificial intelligence, quality control, radiology, statistical analysis

MSC-20202020 Mathematics Subject Classification 68U10; 62P10, 92C50MSC-2020 68-XX: Computer science
MSC-2020 68Uxx: Computing methodologies and applications
MSC-2020 68U10: Computing methodologies for image processing
MSC-2020 62-XX: Statistics
MSC-2020 62Pxx: Applications of statistics
MSC-2020 62P10: Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis
MSC-2020 92-XX: Biology and other natural sciences
MSC-2020 92Cxx: Physiological, cellular and medical topics
MSC-2020 92C50: Medical applications (general)

Acknowledgments: This paper was prepared by a group of authors as a part of the research and development effort titled “Artificial intelligence for synchronous evaluation of images and EHR (multimodal AI)”, in accordance with the Order No. 1213 dated November 27, 2025 "On approval of state assignments funded by means of allocations from the budget of the city of Moscow to the state budgetary (autonomous) institutions subordinate to the Moscow Health Care Department, for 2026 and the planned period of 2027 and 2028" issued by the Moscow Health Care Department.

For citation: Evgeniya A. Krylova, Yuriy A. Vasilev, Vera V. Soboleva, Irina A. Raznitsyna, Tatiana M. Bobrovskaya, Kirill M. Arzamasov. Approaches to Assessing the Accuracy of Measurements Performed by AI-Services in Radiology. Program Systems: Theory and Applications, 2026, 17:3, pp. 105–126. (In Russ.). https://psta.psiras.ru/2026/3_105-126.

Full text of article (PDF): https://psta.psiras.ru/read/psta2026_3_105-126.pdf.

The article was submitted 16.07.2026; approved after reviewing 16.08.2026; accepted for publication 09.09.2026; published online 12.09.2026.

© Krylova E. A., Vasilev Y. A., Soboleva V. V., Raznitsyna I. A., Bobrovskaya T. M., Arzamasov K. M.
2026
Editorial address: Ailamazyan Program Systems Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Peter the First Street 4«a», Veskovo village, Pereslavl area, Yaroslavl region, 152021 Russia;   Website:  http://psta.psiras.ru Phone: +7(4852) 695-228;   E-mail: ;   License: CC-BY-4.0License text on the Creative Commons site
© Ailamazyan Program System Institute of Russian Academy of Science (site design) 2010–2026